🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an larger panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the administration has the authority and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that local officers have control of the circumstances.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as a conflict zone, residents have been posting videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in the state, after attempts to evade the first order by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under review together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the president cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding moves forward and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”